PV recycling line capacity planning
Line sizing is an arithmetic exercise with three inputs, and almost every error comes from substituting a wish for one of them. Here is how to do it p
A price quoted without scope is not information. Two projects with the same annual tonnage can differ substantially in capital cost because one runs manually with one operator and the other is automated with full conveying and extraction; because one produces two output fractions and the other five; because one fits an existing hall and the other needs a new arrangement built around it.
Any supplier who quotes a single figure before asking those questions is either quoting a narrower scope than you think you are buying, or guessing. Both are worth avoiding.
Manual, semi-automatic or automatic stations. This is the largest single driver of capital cost, and it is traded directly against the labour the plant will need. It should be decided from your labour cost and shift pattern, not from preference.
Deframing, junction box removal, glass separation, size reduction, and each subsequent separation stage. Every step you add is capital, floor area and a maintenance obligation — but each one is also a different output stream.
Extraction at breaks and transfer points, sealed collection, dust management. Frequently excluded from first quotations and expensive to add once a building is occupied.
Transfer heights, conveying between stations, output bay arrangement and container access. This is the scope that decides whether the line runs or keeps stopping, and it is a real cost line rather than an accessory.
Erection supervision, cold and hot commissioning on your own modules, operator training and documentation. Worth comparing explicitly between quotations.
| Looks cheaper | What it usually means | What it costs you later |
|---|---|---|
| Fewer stations | A station has been moved out of the scope | You add it later at a worse price and with a worse layout |
| Lower automation | More manual handling per shift | Recurring labour cost; the correct answer when volume is low |
| Containment excluded | Extraction and sealed collection are not included | Retrofit costs, and a permit or audit difficulty |
| No conveying | Operators move material between stations | Through-put set by lifting, and a handling injury risk |
| Output handling omitted | No dedicated bays or container arrangement | Streams get mixed at the final step of a separation process |
| Commissioning excluded | Machine delivered, not commissioned | A line that never reaches its rated cycle |
The number that decides whether the project works is usually not the capital cost but the operating picture: gate fee or purchase cost of incoming modules, the price your buyers pay for each output fraction, labour, power, maintenance, and the transport in and out.
Equipment changes three of those: it changes the yield and quality of each output stream, it changes the labour needed per tonne, and it changes the maintenance and consumable cost. Everything else — gate fee, output prices, transport — is set by your market, not by the machine. That is why a return figure calculated in one market tells you nothing about another.
Send the module mix, through-put, output specification, footprint and labour model. With those five we can quote a defined scope — and show you what changes if you move the automation level.
It depends on the machine, the configuration and the scope around it, so a figure quoted without a brief is not reliable. What we can do is quote a defined scope against your module mix, through-put, output specification and footprint, and show you how the number moves with the automation level.
Often yes, provided the growth path is designed in from the start. Buying one station and adding others later reduces the initial capital, but transfer heights, utility provisions and space reservations have to be planned for in the first phase — otherwise the second phase costs significantly more than it needed to.
In our experience it is containment and material handling. Extraction, sealed collection, conveying and output bays are frequently left out of first quotations, and they are much more expensive to add once the building is occupied and the machines are fixed to the floor.
No, and we would be cautious about any supplier who does. The return depends on your gate fee, your local output prices, your labour cost and your transport distances — none of which we control. We publish the cost drivers instead, so you can build the calculation from your own numbers.
Tell us what arrives at your gate and what has to leave. The engineering team replies with the station configuration, the scope boundary and the information still missing before drawings start.
Prefer to talk first? WhatsApp +86 182 0399 3035 or email [email protected].
Three details are enough to start: what modules you receive, how fast you need to process them, and what output you have to produce.